Time now, the epicentre of conflict between Intel and Nvidia is the output of processors of general use (CPU) and processors graphic (GPU). The own goal however that put Intel recently will remain in. history!

a team from researchers of Intel presented recently a work in International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA) that proves that one roughly two years GPU, as Geforce GTX of 280 Nvidia she is not from ten until thousand times of more rapid eight months of processor of Intel, Core i7-960 but only 2,5 times (on average roughly) and until 14 times more rapid!

the researchers of Intel in deed admitted that they made better possible in order to they optimise the software that ran so much for the CPU what for the GPU, contrary to various tests of past that code of software were optimised for the GPU and no for the GPU.

the effort that they made optimise the code and for the two species chip proved, says Intel, that the shear in the output close drastically. Nvidia from the other, and well makes here that we say him, and it says that the last one did not optimise the code of programs that ran for the GPU, despite the tests ran out-of-the-box while it supports her statements, that is to say enough programmers and companies of growth of software have seen 100X increase in the output when they ran their applications in GPU instead of CPU. Moreover it stresses that it was used passed generation card graphic.

This of course is truth, however in this. to blaim is Intel but Nvidia that didn’t present the &amp? quot? Fermi&amp? quot? earlier. The terminal date for the deposit of work in the congress was and as we know Intel earlier had presented Core i7-960 while Nvidia had not presented Geforce GTX 480 and architectural Fermi in. functional piece of silicon.

Moreover, and according to the documents that they presented the engineers of Intel, were realised will optimise in the code that ran so much in the CPU what in the GPU. It can they did not also make. better that says the reason for the GPU, but no that they did not make also nothing as claims Nvidia. Other they show the elements in the work.

doesn’t

Undeniably, no one say that the &amp? quot? parallel computing&amp? quot? that it appears as advantage Nvidia, specifically in applications HPC (High Performance Computing) is not the better choice. Specifically for the purchase supercomputers and a exigent datacenters increase in the output, even at 2. 5X, she is particularly attractive, thus and differently, for the companies. Also, Intel with the particular work that it deposited, we cannot say that. aytopyrobolithike already alone her in the leg, but it is not also the most beautiful thing you admit that in certain cases your technology comes. second.

Nvidia, as always. excessive. In certain cases, yes, the &amp? quot? parallel computing&amp? quot? it is the ideal solution, but is not also. solution in everything. Specifically when her better GPU costs two and three times more (and we do not speak for a GPU of type Tesla thus) from a very good processor of Intel. The war in any case between the two companies does not say kopasei. We have in deed the impression that we found itself only in the beginning! More you can read.

Patriot Memory, announced the disposal of new line of arthromaton memory of particularly high records (Extreme Performance) Viper II series Sector 7 Edition that are drawn specifically for high output platform of Intel, X58 Express and are addressed in overclockers, enthusiastic users and gamers.

is

ideal solution for computers that are based on their &amp? quot? xekleidotoys&amp? quot? processors Core i7 but also in the processors Core i7 Extreme Edition of Intel.

&amp? quot? Is Sector 7 publication of line of memories Extreme Performance DDR3 one still example of arthromaton memory of records of Patriot that fills and exceeds the expectations as long as it concerns in the records of even most enthusiastic christon&amp? quot? declared Les Henry, Vice President of Engineering of Patriot. &amp? quot? The memories Sector 7 constitute upgrade of our previous memories that combines the better elements in the frame of family of products that is addressed specifically in the enthusiastic users. This does solution suit absolutely with our objective, we offer the last word of technology and the most optimal records in the line of products mas&amp? quot? .

\of # triple-channel arthromata memory of publication Sector of 7 Patriot are available in kit 6GB (3 x 2GB), 12GB (6 x 2GB) and 24GB (6 x 4GB) in frequencies of operation 1600MHz, (6GB, 12GB or 24GB with timings 9-9-9-24 in the 1. 65V), 1800MHz (, 6GB, 1. 65V with timings 9-9-9-27) and 2000MHz (6GB, 1. 65V with timings 9-9-9-27, you lower if you want the relative pdf file from) and are the continuation of natural of arthromaton memory dual-channel Sector 5 that is intended for platform P55 Express of Intel.

\of # Each arthroma memory Viper II series Sector 7 allocates the most qualitative materials and are tryed 100% with the hand, so that are ensured the biggest possible output but also compatibility with the platform Intel X58 Express and are covered by guarantee ef `of term of life.

the known company Club 3D is expected to circulate at an early date a card graphic with the GPU of Nvidia, Geforce GTX 465 and from as long as we can occupy from the photographs it is based in the card of report of Nvidia. Moreover, chronismoi they remain in the &amp? quot? ergostasiaka&amp? quot? levels.

This means that the GPU, shaders and the memory, that incidentally is type GDDR5 and has size of 1GB, allocate respectively frequencies of operation 607MHz, 1215MHz and 3206MHz.

the GPU is constituted globally by 352 cores CUDA and supports technology DirectX 11, OpenGL 4. 0, PhysX, Nvidia SLI and 3D Vision Surround. As long as it concerns in the exits, it allocates two DVI as well as mini-HDMI. Is the cost of new Club 3D Geforce GTX 465 &amp? euro? 291.

does

the idea of refrigeration of computers via immersion in fluid, exist for roughly 50 years, however was used in minimal cases, in certain super computers as an example, and never until today it didn’t reach does become &amp? quot? mainstream&amp? quot? .

Certain of course bold users and companies, have used mineral oils or other not driver liquids for the refrigeration of desktop computers, however the all efforts remained in experimental stage while the technology did not develop considerably.

Perhaps of course are to blaim also other factors for this, as as an example that all the technological community, for some paradoxical, almost archetypal reason, believes that the combination of computers with the liquids is. villain (Liquids + PC = Destruction). The company Corvalent however has different opinion and it supports that the particular technology in little time will become at last. mainstream. See in video that follows the reasons that the company Corvalent believes such something.

the liquid that is used in the particular case costs expensively, the roughly $79 litre. If however knows success the particular method of refrigeration, then likely the cost to fall considerably.

the line of &amp? quot? V&amp? quot? Cooler Master it acquired one still member. It is the psyktra V6, that is smaller in size from the V8 and V10 but allocates similar reasonable as long as it concerns in her designing, with two lines from heatpipes in form &amp? quot? V&amp? quot? and asymmetrically fins in order to it offers high output in every case.

news Cooler Master V6 has dimensions 131,5 x 120 x 165mm and weighs 805 grams.

Is equipped with cupreous base, six cupreous heatpipes with diameter 6mm as well as with fan 120mm (with DynaLoop bearing and red LED) that works with rythm of rotation between 800 and 2200 turns thin (rpm, rotations per minute). His levels of noise oscillate also between 15 and 38dBA.

circulation 130 portable (notebook) and table (desktop PC) computers - which are based on technology VISION of AMD - they draw they realise the AMD and her world collaborators: , and.

are the new drawings of computers ideally for the summer interruptions but also for the &amp? quot? return in scholeia&amp? quot? and give the possibility in the consumers of choice for a PC of their trials of specifications.

technology VISION of AMD replaces the complex technical specifications with simple descriptions contributing in the better comprehension of characteristics that can offer PCs. At the same time, technology VISION of AMD provides exceptional quality of depiction and high output rendering the computers that are based on technology VISION ideal for users that they like they enjoy video high clarity, they process and are shared photographs or video with friends, they play games and they communicate online.

You read with regard to the new desktop but also new portable computers mainstream (and) and ultrathin (and).